Two forensic experts say key evidence used to charge a woman in a decades-old Kentucky infant death case is scientifically unreliable, raising new questions about the prosecution.
Indictment tied to decades-old landfill discovery
In January, Jennifer Cummins, 55, was indicted on a murder charge in connection with the death of an infant found in 1991 at a landfill near Eastern Kentucky University.
The baby, identified as “Baby Jane Doe,” was discovered by a sanitation worker, but the case went cold for years before being reopened with modern investigative techniques.
Experts say lung float test is flawed
Now, two forensic specialists—including Meredith Frame, a former state medical examiner—argue that the lung float test used in the original autopsy is outdated and unreliable.
The test was used to conclude the baby had been born alive. However, experts say decomposition can create gases that cause lung tissue to float, leading to false results.
National Association of Medical Examiners no longer considers the test scientifically valid for determining live birth.
Cause of death now disputed
Frame stated there is no clear evidence the infant was born alive and said the death should be classified as “undetermined” rather than homicide.
A second expert, Steven White, agreed, concluding the baby was likely stillborn and that no medical evidence proves otherwise.
Defense pushes back against murder charge
Cummins’ legal team argues that without reliable proof of live birth, the foundation of the murder charge is weakened.
Her attorney has requested a reduction of her $1 million bond, with a pretrial hearing scheduled.
Case highlights evolving forensic science
The case underscores how advances in forensic science can challenge older investigative methods, especially in cases that rely on techniques now considered outdated.